u-boot-brain/test
Lukasz Majewski 56c4046038 spi: Convert CONFIG_DM_SPI* to CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)DM_SPI*
This change allows more fine tuning of driver model based SPI support in
SPL and TPL. It is now possible to explicitly enable/disable the DM_SPI
support in SPL and TPL via Kconfig option.

Before this change it was necessary to use:
    /* SPI Flash Configs */
    #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
    #undef CONFIG_DM_SPI
    #undef CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH
    #undef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_MTD
    #endif

in the ./include/configs/<board>.h, which is error prone and shall be
avoided when we strive to switch to Kconfig.

The goal of this patch:

Provide distinction for DM_SPI support in both U-Boot proper and SPL (TPL).
Valid use case is when U-Boot proper wants to use DM_SPI, but SPL must
still support non DM driver.

Another use case is the conversion of non DM/DTS SPI driver to support
DM/DTS. When such driver needs to work in both SPL and U-Boot proper, the
distinction is needed in Kconfig (also if SPL version of the driver
supports OF_PLATDATA).

In the end of the day one would have to support following use cases (in
single driver file - e.g. mxs_spi.c):

- U-Boot proper driver supporting DT/DTS
- U-Boot proper driver without DT/DTS support (deprecated)
- SPL driver without DT/DTS support
- SPL (and TPL) driver with DT/DTS (when the SoC has enough resources to
  run full blown DT/DTS)
- SPL driver with DT/DTS and SPL_OF_PLATDATA (when one have constrained
  environment with no fitImage and OF_LIBFDT support).

Some boards do require SPI support (with DM) in SPL (TPL) and some only
have DM_SPI{_FLASH} defined to allow compiling SPL.

This patch converts #ifdef CONFIG_DM_SPI* to #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_SPI)
and provides corresponding defines in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> #da850-evm
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
[trini: Fixup a few platforms]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2020-06-29 13:34:43 -04:00
..
dm spi: Convert CONFIG_DM_SPI* to CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)DM_SPI* 2020-06-29 13:34:43 -04:00
env common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
fs Consistently use nproc for counting the CPUs 2020-01-30 13:30:35 -05:00
image test: Update test-imagetools.sh to match new syntax 2019-03-08 11:31:44 -05:00
lib common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
log common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
optee common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
overlay common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
py test/py: use actual core count for parallel builds 2020-06-02 13:06:07 -04:00
stdint Remove <inttypes.h> includes and PRI* usages in printf() entirely 2018-09-10 20:48:17 -04:00
trace SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style 2018-05-07 09:34:12 -04:00
bloblist.c command: Remove the cmd_tbl_t typedef 2020-05-18 18:36:55 -04:00
cmd_ut.c command: Remove the cmd_tbl_t typedef 2020-05-18 18:36:55 -04:00
command_ut.c common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
common.sh Consistently use nproc for counting the CPUs 2020-01-30 13:30:35 -05:00
compression.c test: Use ut_asserteq_mem() where possible 2020-05-19 14:01:47 -04:00
Kconfig test: log functions with CONFIG_LOG=n 2020-04-16 08:07:58 -06:00
Makefile test: Add the beginnings of some string tests 2020-04-24 16:40:09 -04:00
nokia_rx51_test.sh Nokia RX-51: Add automated test for running RX-51 build in qemu 2020-05-19 14:41:04 +05:30
print_ut.c common: Drop log.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:18 -04:00
README test: Add a 'make qcheck' target for quicker testing 2018-11-29 09:30:05 -07:00
run Add a 'make tcheck' option to test tools 2020-04-26 14:25:21 -06:00
str_ut.c command: Remove the cmd_tbl_t typedef 2020-05-18 18:36:55 -04:00
time_ut.c common: Drop linux/delay.h from common header 2020-05-18 21:19:23 -04:00
unicode_ut.c test: Use ut_asserteq_mem() where possible 2020-05-19 14:01:47 -04:00
ut.c test: Add a way to check each line of console output 2020-02-05 19:33:46 -07:00

Testing in U-Boot
=================

U-Boot has a large amount of code. This file describes how this code is
tested and what tests you should write when adding a new feature.


Running tests
-------------

To run most tests on sandbox, type this:

    make check

in the U-Boot directory. Note that only the pytest suite is run using this
command.

Some tests take ages to run. To run just the quick ones, type this:

    make qcheck


Sandbox
-------
U-Boot can be built as a user-space application (e.g. for Linux). This
allows test to be executed without needing target hardware. The 'sandbox'
target provides this feature and it is widely used in tests.


Pytest Suite
------------

Many tests are available using the pytest suite, in test/py. This can run
either on sandbox or on real hardware. It relies on the U-Boot console to
inject test commands and check the result. It is slower to run than C code,
but provides the ability to unify lots of tests and summarise their results.

You can run the tests on sandbox with:

	./test/py/test.py --bd sandbox --build

This will produce HTML output in build-sandbox/test-log.html

See test/py/README.md for more information about the pytest suite.


tbot
----

Tbot provides a way to execute tests on target hardware. It is intended for
trying out both U-Boot and Linux (and potentially other software) on a
number of boards automatically. It can be used to create a continuous test
environment. See http://www.tbot.tools for more information.


Ad-hoc tests
------------

There are several ad-hoc tests which run outside the pytest environment:

   test/fs	- File system test (shell script)
   test/image	- FIT and legacy image tests (shell script and Python)
   test/stdint	- A test that stdint.h can be used in U-Boot (shell script)
   trace	- Test for the tracing feature (shell script)

TODO: Move these into pytest.


When to write tests
-------------------

If you add code to U-Boot without a test you are taking a risk. Even if you
perform thorough manual testing at the time of submission, it may break when
future changes are made to U-Boot. It may even break when applied to mainline,
if other changes interact with it. A good mindset is that untested code
probably doesn't work and should be deleted.

You can assume that the Pytest suite will be run before patches are accepted
to mainline, so this provides protection against future breakage.

On the other hand there is quite a bit of code that is not covered with tests,
or is covered sparingly. So here are some suggestions:

- If you are adding a new uclass, add a sandbox driver and a test that uses it
- If you are modifying code covered by an existing test, add a new test case
  to cover your changes
- If the code you are modifying has not tests, consider writing one. Even a
  very basic test is useful, and may be picked up and enhanced by others. It
  is much easier to add onto a test - writing a new large test can seem
  daunting to most contributors.


Future work
-----------

Converting existing shell scripts into pytest tests.