The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
At present panic() is in the vsprintf.h header file. That does not seem
like an obvious choice for hang(), even though it relates to panic(). So
let's put hang() in its own header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Migrate a few more files]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Converted to use fsl_esdhc_imx for i.MX platforms.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Jason Liu <Jason.hui.liu@nxp.com>
Staticize 'spl_dram_init' and 'i2c_pad_info1' to fix the
following sparse warnings:
board/freescale/imx8mq_evk/spl.c:30:6: warning: symbol 'spl_dram_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
board/freescale/imx8mq_evk/spl.c:41:22: warning: symbol 'i2c_pad_info1' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
