Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When binman is in use, most of the targets built by the Makefile are
inputs to binman. We then need a final rule to run binman to produce the
final outputs.
Rename the variable to indicate this, and add a new 'inputs' target.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Move this function into init.h which seems to be designed for this sort
of thing. Also update the header to declare struct global_data so that it
can be included without global_data.h being needed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When flashing U-Boot on a Boston board using Xilinx Vivado tools, the
final 0x00 byte which ends the .relocs section seems to be skipped &
left in flash as 0xff unless the data contained in the .mcs is padded
out to a 16 byte boundary. Without our final zero byte relocation will
fail with an error about a spurious reloc:
Avoid this problem by padding out the data in the .mcs file to a 16 byte
boundary using srec_cat's -range-pad functionality.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
U-Boot is generally flashed to a MIPS Boston development board by means
of a .mcs file which Xilinx Vivado software can write to the flash
present on the board. As such we'd generally want to produce an mcs file
when building U-Boot to target the Boston board. Introduce a make target
for u-boot.mcs which generates it using the srec_cat tool available from
the SRecord project, and build it by default when srec_cat is present.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
MIPS is no longer a part of Imagination Technologies, and as such my
@imgtec.com email address will soon cease to function. This patch
updates occurrances of it with my new @mips.com email address, and adds
an entry in .mailmap such that git (& tools such as get_maintainer.pl
when examining history) will use the new address.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
The lowlevel_display() function includes a "1:" label which is never
used. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
The boston lowlevel_init() function zeroes the return register v0,
despite the function not being expected to return a value & that value
never being used.
Remove the redundant assignment to v0.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
The boston memory map isn't suited to the simple "all memory starting
from 0" approach that the MIPS arch_fixup_fdt() implementation takes.
Instead we need to indicate the first 256MiB of DDR from 0 and the rest
from 0x90000000. Implement ft_board_setup to do that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This allows us to use the same DRAM init function on all archs. Add a
dummy function for arc, which does not use DRAM init here.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Dummy function on nios2]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present we cannot use this function as an init sequence call without a
wrapper, since it returns the RAM size. Adjust it to set the RAM size in
global_data instead, and return 0 on success.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
It looks like only cm5200 and tqm8xx use this feature, so we don't really
need it in generic code. Drop it and have the users access gd->board_type
directly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
This patch introduces support for building U-Boot to run on the MIPS
Boston development board. This is a board built around an FPGA & an
Intel EG20T Platform Controller Hub, used largely as part of the
development of new CPUs and their software support. It is essentially
the successor to the older MIPS Malta board.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
