pci: fix some warnings related to assumptions about

The following commit introduced some warnings associated with using
pci_addr_t instead of a proper 32-bit data type.

commit af778c6d9e
Author: Andrew Sharp <andywyse6@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 1 12:27:16 2012 +0000

    pci: fix errant data types and corresponding access functions

On some platforms pci_addr_t is defined as a 64-bit data type so its not
proper to use with pci_{read,write}_config_dword.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kumar Gala 2012-09-19 04:47:36 +00:00 committed by Anatolij Gustschin
parent 5bfa78db4f
commit cf5787f2a4
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -118,11 +118,11 @@ PCI_WRITE_VIA_DWORD_OP(word, u16, 0x02, 0x0000ffff)
void *pci_map_bar(pci_dev_t pdev, int bar, int flags)
{
pci_addr_t pci_bus_addr;
pci_addr_t bar_response;
u32 bar_response;
/* read BAR address */
pci_read_config_dword(pdev, bar, &bar_response);
pci_bus_addr = bar_response & ~0xf;
pci_bus_addr = (pci_addr_t)(bar_response & ~0xf);
/*
* Pass "0" as the length argument to pci_bus_to_virt. The arg
@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ int pci_hose_config_device(struct pci_controller *hose,
pci_addr_t mem,
unsigned long command)
{
pci_addr_t bar_response;
u32 bar_response;
unsigned int old_command;
pci_addr_t bar_value;
pci_size_t bar_size;

View File

@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void pciauto_setup_device(struct pci_controller *hose,
struct pci_region *prefetch,
struct pci_region *io)
{
pci_addr_t bar_response;
u32 bar_response;
pci_size_t bar_size;
u16 cmdstat = 0;
int bar, bar_nr = 0;