[ Upstream commit a194c5f2d2b3a05428805146afcabe5140b5d378 ]
The @node passed to cpumask_of_node() can be NUMA_NO_NODE, in that
case it will trigger the following WARN_ON(node >= nr_node_ids) due to
mismatched data types of @node and @nr_node_ids. Actually we should
return cpu_all_mask just like most other architectures do if passed
NUMA_NO_NODE.
Also add a similar check to the inline cpumask_of_node() in numa.h.
Signed-off-by: Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200921023936.21846-1-liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Currently numa_clear_node removes both cpu information from the NUMA
node cpumap as well as the NUMA node id from the cpu. Similarly
numa_store_cpu_info updates both percpu nodeid and NUMA cpumap.
However we need to retain the numa node id for the cpu and only remove
the cpu information from the numa node cpumap during CPU hotplug out.
The same can be extended for hotplugging in the CPU.
This patch separates out numa_{add,remove}_cpu from numa_clear_node and
numa_store_cpu_info.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
Tested-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit a7be6e5a7f ("mm: drop useless local parameters of
__register_one_node()") removes the last user of parent_node().
The parent_node() macro in ARM64 platform is unnecessary.
Remove it for cleanup.
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Introduce a new file to hold ACPI based NUMA information parsing from
SRAT and SLIT.
SRAT includes the CPU ACPI ID to Proximity Domain mappings and memory
ranges to Proximity Domain mapping. SLIT has the information of inter
node distances(relative number for access latency).
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
[rrichter@cavium.com Reworked for numa v10 series ]
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
[david.daney@cavium.com reorderd and combinded with other patches in
Hanjun Guo's original set, removed get_mpidr_in_madt() and use
acpi_map_madt_entry() instead.]
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Attempt to get the memory and CPU NUMA node via of_numa. If that
fails, default the dummy NUMA node and map all memory and CPUs to node
0.
Tested-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
