Again but better

Unicode matching too hard for 3.2?
2024-12-22 20:20:09 +09:00 · 2024-12-12 16:32:25 +00:00 · 2024-12-12 16:26:57 +00:00
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
--- a/test/test_jsinterp.py
+++ b/test/test_jsinterp.py
@ -516,11 +516,12 @@ class TestJSInterpreter(unittest.TestCase):
                   ['t', 'e', 's', 't'])
        self._test('function f(){return "t-e-s-t".split(/[es-]+/)}',
                   ['t', 't'])
-        # from MDN: surrogate pairs aren't handled: case 1 fails
+        # from MDN: surrogate pairs aren't handled: case 1 fails, and case 2 beats Py3.2
-        # self._test('function f(){return "😄😄".split(/(?:)/)}',
+        if sys.version_info >= (2, 6) and not ((3, 0) <= sys.version_info < (3, 3)):
-        #           ['\ud83d', '\ude04', '\ud83d', '\ude04'])
+            # self._test('function f(){return "😄😄".split(/(?:)/)}',
-        self._test('function f(){return "😄😄".split(/(?:)/u)}',
+            #            ['\ud83d', '\ude04', '\ud83d', '\ude04'])
-                   ['😄', '😄'])
+            self._test('function f(){return "😄😄".split(/(?:)/u)}',
                       ['😄', '😄'])
    def test_slice(self):
        self._test('function f(){return [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].slice()}', [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8])
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dirkf	65ea8e014a	Again but better	2024-12-12 16:32:25 +00:00
dirkf	803210d287	Unicode matching too hard for 3.2?	2024-12-12 16:26:57 +00:00