The blk_base test case creates a USB mass storage block device with
the Sandbox host block device as its parent. This does not make any
sense and causes potential issue, for example if the test case tries
to read/write anything on the USB mass storage block device it will
definitely fail as its parent is not on USB bus at all.
Correct the test case by creating another Sandbox host block device
instead of the USB mass storage one and adjust the case accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
There is an overflow problem when taking the size instead of the number
of blocks in blk_create_device(). This results in a wrong device size: the
device apparent size is its real size modulo 4GB.
Using the number of blocks instead of the device size fixes the problem and
is more coherent with the internals of the block layer.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Many devices support a child block device (e.g. MMC, USB). Add a
convenient way to get this device given the parent device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The intention with block devices is that the device number (devnum field
in its descriptor) matches the alias of its parent device. For example,
with:
aliases {
mmc0 = "/sdhci@700b0600";
mmc1 = "/sdhci@700b0400";
}
we expect that the block devices for mmc0 and mmc1 would have device
numbers of 0 and 1 respectively.
Unfortunately this does not currently always happen. If there is another
MMC device earlier in the driver model data structures its block device
will be created first. It will therefore get device number 0 and mmc0
will therefore miss out. In this case the MMC device will have sequence
number 0 but its block device will not.
To avoid this, allow a device to request a device number and bump any
existing device number that is using it. This all happens during the
binding phase so it is safe to change these numbers around. This allows
device numbers to match the aliases in all circumstances.
Add a test to verify the behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Sometimes it is useful to be able to find a block device without also
probing it. Add a function for this as well as the associated test.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add some tests to check that block devices work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Simon Glass