If use the onenand boot, the env_relocate_spec() calls mtd->read(),
and the type of the argument #2 of mtd->read() was changed to loff_t.
But, the "env_addr" type is still unsigned long, thus this patch change
the type from unsigned long to loff_t.
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim <riverful.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
This patch brings the U-Boot MTD infrastructure in sync with the current
Linux MTD version (2.6.30-rc3). Biggest change is the 64bit device size
support and a resync of the mtdpart.c file which has seen multiple fixes
meanwhile.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Without this patch "saveenv" crashes when MTD partitions are enabled (e.g.
for use in UBI) via CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Since page size field is changed from oobblock to writesize. But OneNAND is not updated.
- fix bufferram management at erase operation
This patch includes the NAND/OneNAND state filed too.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
While locally preparing some U-Boot patches for ARM based OMAP3 boards, some
using OneNAND and some using NAND, we found some differences in OneNAND and
NAND command address handling.
As this might confuse users (it already confused us), we like to align OneNAND
and NAND address handling.
The issue is that cmd_onenand.c subtracts the onenand base address from the
addresses you type into the u-boot command line so, unlike nand, you can't
use addresses relative to the start of the onenand part e.g. this won't work:
onenand read 82000000 280000 400000
you have to use:
onenand read 82000000 20280000 400000
Looking at recent git, the only board currently using OneNAND is Apollon, and
for this the OneNAND base address is 0 (apollon.h)
#define CFG_ONENAND_BASE 0x00000000
so patch below won't break any existing boards and will align OneNAND and NAND
handling on boards where OneNAND base address is != 0.
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pillai@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
