A new DPLL DDR is added in DRA7XX socs. Now clocks to
EMIF CD is from DPLL DDR. So DPLL DDR should be locked
before initializing RAM.
Also adding other dpll data which are different from OMAP5 ES2.0.
SYS_CLK running at 20MHz is introduced in DRA7xx socs.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
PRCM register addresses are changed from OMAP5 ES2.0 to DRA7XX.
So adding the necessary register changes for DRA7XX socs.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Change OPP settings as per the latest 0.5 version of
addendum for OMAP5430 ES2.0. omap4/hw_data.c is touched
here to add dummy dividers.
While here correcting OPP_NOM mpu, core frequency for
OMAP4430 ES2.x
Note that OMAP5430 ES1.0 support is still kept alive and
would be removed in a cleanup later.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
A seperate omap_sys_ctrl_regs structure is defined for
omap4 & 5. If there is any change in control module for
any of the ES versions, a new structure needs to be created.
In order to remove this dependency, making the register
structure generic for all the omap4+ boards.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
The pmic code is duplicated for OMAP 4 and 5.
Instead move the data to Soc specific place and
share the code.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Currently there is quite a lot of code which
is duplicated in the clocks code for OMAP 4 and 5
Socs. Avoiding this here by moving the clocks
data to a SOC specific place and the sharing the
common code.
This helps in addition of a new Soc with minimal
changes.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
The current PRCM structure prototype directly matches the hardware
register layout. So there is a need to change this for every new silicon
revision which has register space changes.
Avoiding this by making the prototye generic and populating the register
addresses seperately for all Socs.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
