Make a few adjustments to allow us to build an SPL image for coreboot.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
These functions do not use driver model but are fairly widely used in
U-Boot. But it is not clear that they will use driver model anytime soon,
so we don't want to label them as 'legacy'.
Move them to a new irq_func.h header file. Avoid the name 'irq.h' since it
is widely used in U-Boot already.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We cannot init the CPU fully both than once during a boot. Add a new
function which can be called to figure out the CPU identity, but which
does not change anything. For x86_64, this is empty for now.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
At present in arch_setup_gd() it calls printch(' ') at the end which
has been a mystery for a long time as without such call the 64-bit
U-Boot just does not boot at all.
In fact this is due to the bug that board_init_f() was called with
boot_flags not being set. Hence whatever value being there in the
rdi register becomes the boot_flags if without such magic call.
With a printch(' ') call the rdi register is initialized as 0x20
and this value seems to be sane enough for the whole boot process.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
On x86_64 the field global_data_ptr is assigned before relocation. As
sections for uninitialized global data (.bss) overlap with the relocation
sections (.rela) this destroys the relocation table and leads to spurious
errors.
Initialization forces the global_data_ptr into a section for initialized
global data (.data) which cannot overlap any .rela section.
Fixes: a160092a61 ("x86: Support global_data on x86_64")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present we misuse print_cpuinfo() do so CPU init on x86. This is done
because it is the next available call after the console is enabled. But
several arches use checkcpu() instead. Despite the horrible name (which
we can fix), it seems a better choice.
Adjust the various x86 CPU implementations to move their init code into
checkcpu() and use print_cpuinfo() only for printing CPU info.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
We don't have the code for this yet. Add a dummy version for now, so that
EFI builds correctly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
We don't support SDRAM init in 64-bit mode since it is essentially
impossible to get into that mode before SDRAM set up. Provide dummy functions
for now. At some point we will need to pass the SDRAM parameters through from
SPL.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
At present this is just an ordinary variable. We may consider making it a
fixed register in the future.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
There is not much needed at present, but set up a separate directory to put
this code as it grows.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
