Tegra210 starts its drive group registers at a different offset from the
APB MISC register block that other SoCs. Update the code to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
T210 support HSM and Schmitt options in the pinmux register (previous
chips placed these options in the drive group register). Update the
code to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Tegra210 moves some bits around in the pinmux registers. Update the code
to handle this.
This doesn't attempt to address the issues with the group-to-group varying
drive group register layout mentioned earlier. This patch handles the
SoC-to-SoC differences in the mux register layout.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
On some future SoCs, some per-drive-group features became per-pin
features. Move all type definitions early in the header so they can
be enabled irrespective of the setting of TEGRA_PMX_SOC_HAS_DRVGRPS.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
On some future SoCs, some of the per-drive-group features no longer
exist. Add some ifdefs to support this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Future SoCs have a slightly different combination of pinmux options per
pin. This will be simpler to handle if we simply have one define per
option, rather than grouping various options together, in combinations
that don't align with future chips.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Tegra's drive group registers have a remarkably inconsistent layout. The
current U-Boot driver doesn't take this into account at all. Add a
comment to describe the issue, so at least anyone debugging the driver
will be aware of this. To solve this, we'd need to add a per-drive-group
data structure describing the layout for the individual register. Since
we don't set up too many drive groups in U-Boot at present, this
hopefully isn't causing too much practical issue. Still, we probably need
to fix this sometime.
Wth Tegra210, the register layout becomes almost entirely consistent, so
this problem partially solves itself over time.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
This is needed to correctly apply the new Jetson TK1 pinmux config.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
When the CPU is in non-secure (NS) mode (when running U-Boot under a
secure monitor), certain actions cannot be taken, since they would need
to write to secure-only registers. One example is configuring the ARM
architectural timer's CNTFRQ register.
We could support this in one of two ways:
1) Compile twice, once for secure mode (in which case anything goes) and
once for non-secure mode (in which case certain actions are disabled).
This complicates things, since everyone needs to keep track of
different U-Boot binaries for different situations.
2) Detect NS mode at run-time, and optionally skip any impossible actions.
This has the advantage of a single U-Boot binary working in all cases.
(2) is not possible on ARM in general, since there's no architectural way
to detect secure-vs-non-secure. However, there is a Tegra-specific way to
detect this.
This patches uses that feature to detect secure vs. NS mode on Tegra, and
uses that to:
* Skip the ARM arch timer initialization.
* Set/clear an environment variable so that boot scripts can take
different action depending on which mode the CPU is in. This might be
something like:
if CPU is secure:
load secure monitor code into RAM.
boot secure monitor.
secure monitor will restart (a new copy of) U-Boot in NS mode.
else:
execute normal boot process
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Some systems have so much RAM that the end of RAM is beyond 4GB. An
example would be a Tegra124 system (where RAM starts at 2GB physical)
that has more than 2GB of RAM.
In this case, we want gd->ram_size to represent the actual RAM size, so
that the actual RAM size is passed to the OS. This is useful if the OS
implements LPAE, and can actually use the "extra" RAM.
However, we can't use get_ram_size() to verify the actual amount of RAM
present on such systems, since some of the RAM can't be accesses, which
confuses that function. Avoid calling get_ram_size() when the RAM size
is too large for it to work correctly. It's never actually needed anyway,
since there's no reason for the BCT to report the wrong RAM size.
In systems with >=4GB RAM, we still need to clip the reported RAM size
since U-Boot uses a 32-bit variable to represent the RAM size in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
size_mb is used to hold a value that's sometimes KB, sometimes MB,
and sometimes bytes. Use separate correctly named variables to avoid
confusion here. Also fix indentation of a conditional statement.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined,
smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and runs into secure_ram_addr(
_smp_pen), before code is relocated to secure ram.
So need relocation to secure ram before enable secondary cores.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
ED Mini V2 is based on Orion 5x which boots at fixed
address 0xFFFF0000 in NOR Flash. Place SPL there, and
switch U-Boot from .bin to .img format, stored in
NOR Flash at 0xFFF90000.
Note: this patch was tested on HW and works, i.e.
it boots U-Boot properly, but SPL console output
currently does not appear, due to GD being trashed
by arch/arm/lib/spl.c. This trashing is soon to be
removed, and then ED Mini V2 SPL console output will
become visible.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Older linux-sunxi-3.4 kernels override our PLL6 setting with 300 MHz,
halving the mbus frequency, so set it to 300 MHz ourselves and base the
mbus divider on that.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
USB doesn't seem to work yet; the controller detects the on-board Hub/
Ethernet device but can't read the descriptors from it. I haven't
investigated yet.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
The bcm2835 and bcm2836 are essentially identical, except:
- The CPU is an ARM1176 v.s. a quad-core Cortex-A7.
- The physical address of many IO controllers has moved.
Rather than introducing a whole new bcm2836 value for $(SOC) or $(ARCH),
update the existing bcm2835 code to handle the minor differences, and
plumb it into the ARMv7 CPU architecture.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
This commit adds $(srctree)/arch/arm/$(machdirs)/include/mach to
the headers search path.
It allows us to replace "#include <asm/arch/foo.h>" with
"#include <mach/foo.h>". As "#include <asm/arch/foo.h>" is still
supported, we can modify each file one by one.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Move
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/* -> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/*
Note:
Perhaps, can we merge arch/arm/mach-kirkwood and
arch/arm/mvebu-common into arch/arm/mach-mvebu, like Linux?
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
Cc: Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>
In U-boot, the directory structure, arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)/
has been adopted except that $(CPU) is missing from some
architectures and $(SOC) is missing from some CPUs.
This structure did not fit very well in some cases.
[1] AT91
AT91 SoC family have been developed across some ARM processor
generations. Generally speaking, some IPs are often re-used in the
same SoC family (same SoC vendor) even when the main processor is
updated. As a result, a SoC-common directory is needed in the upper
level. Currently, AT91 source files are placed as follows:
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/*
Once directories are split, the motivation for refactorings across
CPU directories is lost. Some files in arm920t/at91/ and
arm926ejs/at91/ are so similar that they could be merged.
[2] Tegra
Tegra is a little bit special case where different CPUs are used for
SPL and the main U-boot. To obey the arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)
structure, the source files must be placed across the CPUs,
again SoC-common directory is necessary in the upper level.
Moreover, there are several families in Tegra: Tegra20, Tegra30,
Tegra114, Tegra124. Here again, the tegra-common directory is needed
to contain commonly-used files.
Tegra directories have been sprinkled in the directory structure.
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra114
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra124
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra-common
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra114
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra124
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra30-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra114-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra124-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra-common
As you see, splitting SoC code by the CPU is not going well,
especially for ARM.
Why don't we collect SoC-specific files into a single place?
A good example we can follow is Linux's arch/arm/mach-* structure.
This item was discussed in the following thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/188548/
Looks like I got some positive responses and we are almost ready to
start this movement.
This commit prepares arch/arm/Makefile for describing machdirs in it.
After this commit, we can move SoC directory to arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)
in simple steps although some cases such as AT91 and Tegra need more
fixes.
What we generally have to do is:
[1] Move files arch/arm/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)/* to arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/*
[2] Add machine entry into arch/arm/Makefile
[3] Remove "obj-y += $(SOC)" from arch/arm/cpu/$(CPU)/Makefile
[4] Fix the Kconfig file path in arch/arm/Kconfig
[5] Modify MAINTAINERS if necessary
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
The board select menu in arch/arm/Kconfig is still big.
To slim down it, this commit moves AT91 boards to
arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.
Also, consolidate "config SYS_SOC" in each board Kconfig.
The Kconfig files under board/ directory were modified with the
following command:
find board -name Kconfig | xargs sed -i -e '
/config SYS_SOC/ {
N
/default "at91"/ {
N
d
}
}
'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.co>
Introduce arch_reserve_stacks() to tailor gd->start_addr_sp and gd->irq_sp to
the architecture needs.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Before avr32 had an extra storage for stack end to have a nice stack printout
on exception. Remove this extra storage and use generic gd->start_addr_sp
instead.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Prefix mmu.h PAGE_xxx definitions with MMU_ in order to prevent a naming
conflict with other definitions.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
cpu_mmc_init() is required by the init sequence to have a working MMC interface
on avr32. This will not be included in the binary if we omit the avr32 board.c
when building the generic board.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
The only LPC3250 board works fine with enabled generic board support,
add CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD right into the arch config header.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
So that the CONFIG_SPL_FEL option is not needed anymore. And the regular
SPL binary, generated by the default u-boot build, is now also bootable
over USB in the FEL mode. The SPL still can boot from the SD card too.
A bunch of system registers need to be saved/restored in order to ensure
that the IRQ handler still works in the BROM FEL code after getting
control back from the SPL. This is done in the sunxi code instead of
abusing ifdefs in 'start.S'.
The decision whether to load the main u-boot binary from the SD card or
return to the FEL code in the BROM is done at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
[hdegoede@redhat.com: Since we now restore various regs before returning to
the FEL BROM code we can drop the sunxi specific #ifdefs in start.S]
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
