As per hardware documentation, ECx_PMUX has precedence
over SerDes protocol.
For LX2160/LX2162 if DPMACs 17 and 18 are enabled as SGMII
through SerDes protocol but ECx_PMUX configured them as RGMII,
then the ports will be configured as RGMII and not SGMII.
Signed-off-by: Razvan Ionut Cirjan <razvanionut.cirjan@nxp.com>
[Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
The next DPMAC was always verified if it is enabled. In case of
DPMAC@6, the DPMAC@7 is verified. As DPMAC@7 is disabled, DPMAC@6 will
be considered disabled and not detected by uboot.
Signed-off-by: Grigore Popescu <grigore.popescu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
some dpmacs in armv8a based freescale layerscape SOCs can be
configured via both serdes(sgmii, xfi, xlaui etc) bits and via
EC*_PMUX(rgmii) bits in RCW.
e.g. dpmac 17 and 18 in LX2160A can be configured as SGMII from
serdes bits and as RGMII via EC1_PMUX/EC2_PMUX bits
Now if a dpmac is enabled by serdes bits then it takes precedence
over EC*_PMUX bits. i.e. in LX2160A if we select serdes protocol
that configures dpmac17 as SGMII and set the EC1_PMUX as RGMII,
then the dpmac is SGMII and not RGMII.
Therefore, in fsl_rgmii_init function of SOC, we will check if the
dpmac is enabled or not? if it is (fsl_serdes_init has already enabled
the dpmac), then don't enable it.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
