The watchdog found on the R40 SoC is the older variant found on the A20.
Add the proper "#if defines" to make it work.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
The R40 is the successor to the A20. It is a hybrid of the A20, A33
and the H3.
The R40's PIO controller is compatible with the A20,
Reuse the A20 UART and I2C muxing code by adding the R40's macro.
The display pipeline is the newer DE 2.0 variant.
Block enabling video on R40 for now.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
The Allwinner H5 is very close to the H3 SoC, but has ARMv8 cores.
To allow sharing the clocks, GPIO and driver code easily, create an
architecture agnostic MACH_SUNXI_H3_H5 Kconfig symbol.
Rename the existing symbol to MACH_SUNXI_H3_H5 where code is shared and
let it be selected by a new shared Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Every armv8 board needs the memory map, so change the #ifdef to
ARM64 to avoid enumerating every single board or SoC.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Instead of enumerating all SoC families that need that bit set, let's
just express this more clearly: The SMP bits needs to be set on
SMP capable ARMv7 CPUs. It's much easier in Kconfig to express it the
other way round, so we use ! CPU_IS_UP and ! ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
If we take the liberty to use register r0 to perform our bit set, we
should be nice enough to tell the compiler about it.
Add r0 to the clobber list to avoid potential mayhem.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Now that the SPL is ready to be compiled in AArch64 and the DRAM
init code is ready, enable SPL support for the A64 SoC and in the
Pine64 defconfig.
For now we keep the boot0 header in the U-Boot proper, as this allows
to still use boot0 as an SPL replacement without hurting the SPL use
case.
We disable FEL support for now by making its compilation conditional
and disabling it for ARM64, as the code isn't ready yet.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
It is useful to name each method so that we can print out this name when
using the method. Currently this happens using a separate function. In
preparation for unifying this, add a name to each method.
The name is only available if we have libcommon support (i.e can use
printf()).
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Since the A80 has many cores which we intend to use in SMP fashion,
we should set the SMP bit for the boot CPU.
[wens@csie.org: Added commit message]
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Rather than having a global variable, pass the spl_image as a parameter.
This avoids BSS use, and makes it clearer what the function is actually
doing.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code. Update existing users.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present some spl_xxx_load_image() functions take a parameter and some
don't. Of those that do, most take an integer but one takes a string.
Convert this parameter into a struct so that we can pass all functions the
same thing. This will allow us to use a common function signature.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Introduce virtual and physical addresses in the mapping table. This change
have no impact on existing boards because they all use idential mapping.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Now that we know that the BROM stores a value indicating the boot-source
at the beginning of SRAM, use that instead of trying to recreate the
BROM's boot probing.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Allwinner devices support SPI flash as one of the possible
bootable media type. The SPI flash chip needs to be connected
to SPI0 pins (port C) to make this work. More information is
available at:
https://linux-sunxi.org/Bootable_SPI_flash
This patch adds the initial support for booting from SPI flash.
The existing SPI frameworks are not used in order to reduce the
SPL code size. Right now the SPL size grows by ~370 bytes when
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option is enabled.
While there are no popular Allwinner devices with SPI flash at
the moment, testing can be done using a SPI flash module (it
can be bought for ~2$ on ebay) and jumper wires with the boards,
which expose relevant pins on the expansion header. The SPI flash
chips themselves are very cheap (some prices are even listed as
low as 4 cents) and should not cost much if somebody decides to
design a development board with an SPI flash chip soldered on
the PCB.
Another nice feature of the SPI flash is that it can be safely
accessed in a device-independent way (since we know that the
boot ROM is already probing these pins during the boot time).
And if, for example, Olimex boards opted to use SPI flash instead
of EEPROM, then they would have been able to have U-Boot installed
in the SPI flash now and boot the rest of the system from the SATA
hard drive. Hopefully we may see new interesting Allwinner based
development boards in the future, now that the software support
for the SPI flash is in a better shape :-)
Testing can be done by enabling the CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option
in a board defconfig, then building U-Boot and finally flashing
the resulting u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin binary over USB OTG with
a help of the sunxi-fel tool:
sunxi-fel spiflash-write 0 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin
The device needs to be switched into FEL (USB recovery) mode first.
The most suitable boards for testing are Orange Pi PC and Pine64.
Because these boards are cheap, have no built-in NAND/eMMC and
expose SPI0 pins on the Raspberry Pi compatible expansion header.
The A13-OLinuXino-Micro board also can be used.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The SPL code already knows which boot device it calls the spl_boot_mode()
on, so pass that information into the function. This allows the code of
spl_boot_mode() avoid invoking spl_boot_device() again, but it also lets
board_boot_order() correctly alter the behavior of the boot process.
The later one is important, since in certain cases, it is desired that
spl_boot_device() return value be overriden using board_boot_order().
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
[add newly introduced zynq variant]
Signed-aff-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
This addresses a cosmetic issue when booting a sunxi device
over USB (FEL mode), where the SPL currently would just print
"Trying to boot from ". The patch fixes that to properly read
"Trying to boot from FEL".
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortmann@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The Allwinner A64 SoC is used in the Pine64. This patch adds
all bits necessary to compile U-Boot for it running in AArch64
mode.
Unfortunately SPL is not ready yet due to legal problems, so
we need to boot using the binary boot0 for now.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
[agraf: remove SPL code, move to AArch64]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Some of the code in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi is actually armv7 specific, while
most of it is just generic code that could as well be used on an AArch64 SoC.
Move all files that are not really tied to armv7 into a new mach-sunxi
directory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
