When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This part of mentioned commit, was missed by my mistake during the rebase.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Original commit message:
power: pmic: pfuze100 support driver model
1. Support driver model for pfuze100.
2. Introduce a new Kconfig entry DM_PMIC_PFUZE100 for pfuze100
3. This driver intends to support PF100, PF200 and PF3000, so add
the device id into the udevice_id array.
4. Rename PMIC_NUM_OF_REGS macro to PFUZE100_NUM_OF_REGS.
Change-Id: I4fc88414f3c0285f9648e47ec7aed60addeccc4d
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
It is redundant to use 'PFUZE100_PMIC' as the PMIC name because we already
know it is a PMIC.
Call it simply 'PFUZE100' instead.
Cc: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: Markus Niebel <Markus.Niebel@tq-group.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Avoid uding pmic_init() as this forces the model of only allowing a
single PMIC driver to be built at a time.
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
