This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When you enable CONFIG_OF_LIVE, you will end up with a lot of
conversions.
To generate this commit, I used coccinelle excluding drivers/core/,
include/dm/, and test/
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
expression dev;
@@
-devfdt_get_addr(dev)
+dev_read_addr(dev)
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
When you enable CONFIG_OF_LIVE, you will end up with a lot of
conversions.
To generate this commit, I used coccinelle excluding drivers/core/,
include/dm/, and test/
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
expression dev;
@@
-devfdt_get_addr(dev)
+dev_read_addr(dev)
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
These three clock functions don't use driver model and should be migrated.
In the meantime, create a new file to hold them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When a driver declares DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag, it wishes to be
bound before relocation. However due to a bug in the DM core,
the flag only takes effect when devices are statically declared
via U_BOOT_DEVICE(). This bug has been fixed recently by commit
"dm: core: Respect drivers with the DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag in
lists_bind_fdt()", but with the fix, it has a side effect that
all existing drivers that declared DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag will
be bound before relocation now. This may expose potential boot
failure on some boards due to insufficient memory during the
pre-relocation stage.
To mitigate this potential impact, the following changes are
implemented:
- Remove DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag in the driver, if the driver
only supports configuration from device tree (OF_CONTROL)
- Keep DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag in the driver only if the device
is statically declared via U_BOOT_DEVICE()
- Surround DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC flag with OF_CONTROL check, for
drivers that support both statically declared devices and
configuration from device tree
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
These support the flat device tree. We want to use the dev_read_..()
prefix for functions that support both flat tree and live tree. So rename
the existing functions to avoid confusion.
In the end we will have:
1. dev_read_addr...() - works on devices, supports flat/live tree
2. devfdt_get_addr...() - current functions, flat tree only
3. of_get_address() etc. - new functions, live tree only
All drivers will be written to use 1. That function will in turn call
either 2 or 3 depending on whether the flat or live tree is in use.
Note this involves changing some dead code - the imx_lpi2c.c file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This patch add support for ar933x serial.
Signed-off-by: Wills Wang <wills.wang@live.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Chou <thomas@wytron.com.tw>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
