mirror of
https://github.com/brain-hackers/u-boot-brain
synced 2024-06-09 23:36:03 +09:00
pinctrl: stmfx: Fix pin configuration issue
pin-controller pin's name must be equal to pin's name used in device tree with "pins" DT property. Issue detected on stm32mp157c-ev1 board with goodix touchscreen. In DT, the goodix's pin is declared in DT with the node: goodix_pins: goodix { pins = "gpio14"; bias-pull-down; }; Whereas in stmfx pin-controller driver, pin's name are equal to "stmfx_gpioxx" where xx is the pin number. This lead to not configure stmfx's pins at probe because pins is identified by its name (see pinctrl_pin_name_to_selector() in pinctrl-generic.c) and stmfx pin "gpio14" can't be found. To fix this issue, come back to the original stmfx pin's name. Revert "pinctrl: stmfx: update pin name" This reverts commit 38d30cdcd65c73eeefac5efa328ad444a53b77dd. Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Tested-by: Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@st.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c005c731f
commit
54f5bf3d61
|
@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_pins_count(struct udevice *dev)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* STMFX pins[15:0] are called "stmfx_gpio[15:0]"
|
||||
* and STMFX pins[23:16] are called "stmfx_agpio[7:0]"
|
||||
* STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]"
|
||||
* and STMFX pins[23:16] are called "agpio[7:0]"
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN 7
|
||||
static char pin_name[MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN];
|
||||
|
@ -352,9 +352,9 @@ static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_pin_name(struct udevice *dev,
|
|||
unsigned int selector)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (selector < STMFX_MAX_GPIO)
|
||||
snprintf(pin_name, MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN, "stmfx_gpio%u", selector);
|
||||
snprintf(pin_name, MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN, "gpio%u", selector);
|
||||
else
|
||||
snprintf(pin_name, MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN, "stmfx_agpio%u", selector - 16);
|
||||
snprintf(pin_name, MAX_PIN_NAME_LEN, "agpio%u", selector - 16);
|
||||
return pin_name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user