dma: bcm6348: incorrect buffer allocation
Calling calloc() for 0 members does not make any sense. Setting ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL for ch_priv->desc_cnt > 0 is equally unreasonable. The current code will lead to a NULL dereference in bcm6348_iudma_enable(). The assignments for ch_priv->busy_desc are obviously swapped. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e9a530a61
commit
4908067b8f
|
@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static int bcm6348_iudma_request(struct dma *dma)
|
|||
ch_priv->desc_id = 0;
|
||||
if (bcm6348_iudma_chan_is_rx(dma->id)) {
|
||||
ch_priv->desc_cnt = 0;
|
||||
ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
|
||||
ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ch_priv->desc_cnt = ch_priv->dma_ring_size;
|
||||
ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
|
||||
ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue