doc: driver-model: Convert remoteproc-framework.txt to reST

Convert plain text documentation to reStructuredText format and add
it to Sphinx TOC tree. No essential content change.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bin Meng 2019-07-18 00:33:58 -07:00 committed by Tom Rini
parent cf4747d294
commit 175ba0fe94
2 changed files with 90 additions and 88 deletions

View File

@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ Driver Model
of-plat
pci-info
pmic-framework
remoteproc-framework

View File

@ -1,19 +1,12 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
#
# (C) Copyright 2015
# Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
#
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
.. (C) Copyright 2015
.. Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
Remote Processor Framework
==========================
TOC:
1. Introduction
2. How does it work - The driver
3. Describing the device using platform data
4. Describing the device using device tree
1. Introduction
===============
Introduction
------------
This is an introduction to driver-model for Remote Processors found
on various System on Chip(SoCs). The term remote processor is used to
@ -24,43 +17,44 @@ the processor on which we are functional.
The simplified model depends on a single UCLASS - UCLASS_REMOTEPROC
UCLASS_REMOTEPROC:
- drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c
- include/remoteproc.h
- drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c
- include/remoteproc.h
Commands:
- common/cmd_remoteproc.c
- common/cmd_remoteproc.c
Configuration:
CONFIG_REMOTEPROC is selected by drivers as needed
CONFIG_CMD_REMOTEPROC for the commands if required.
- CONFIG_REMOTEPROC is selected by drivers as needed
- CONFIG_CMD_REMOTEPROC for the commands if required.
2. How does it work - The driver
=================================
How does it work - The driver
-----------------------------
Overall, the driver statemachine transitions are typically as follows:
(entry)
+-------+
+---+ init |
| | | <---------------------+
| +-------+ |
| |
| |
| +--------+ |
Load| | reset | |
| | | <----------+ |
| +--------+ | |
| |Load | |
| | | |
| +----v----+ reset | |
+-> | | (opt) | |
| Loaded +-----------+ |
| | |
+----+----+ |
| Start |
+---v-----+ (opt) |
+->| Running | Stop |
Ping +- | +--------------------+
(opt) +---------+
Overall, the driver statemachine transitions are typically as follows::
(entry)
+-------+
+---+ init |
| | | <---------------------+
| +-------+ |
| |
| |
| +--------+ |
Load| | reset | |
| | | <----------+ |
| +--------+ | |
| |Load | |
| | | |
| +----v----+ reset | |
+-> | | (opt) | |
| Loaded +-----------+ |
| | |
+----+----+ |
| Start |
+---v-----+ (opt) |
+->| Running | Stop |
Ping +- | +--------------------+
(opt) +---------+
(is_running does not change state)
opt: Optional state transition implemented by driver.
@ -83,23 +77,25 @@ The driver follows a standard UCLASS DM.
in the bare minimum form:
static const struct dm_rproc_ops sandbox_testproc_ops = {
.load = sandbox_testproc_load,
.start = sandbox_testproc_start,
};
.. code-block:: c
static const struct udevice_id sandbox_ids[] = {
{.compatible = "sandbox,test-processor"},
{}
};
static const struct dm_rproc_ops sandbox_testproc_ops = {
.load = sandbox_testproc_load,
.start = sandbox_testproc_start,
};
U_BOOT_DRIVER(sandbox_testproc) = {
.name = "sandbox_test_proc",
.of_match = sandbox_ids,
.id = UCLASS_REMOTEPROC,
.ops = &sandbox_testproc_ops,
.probe = sandbox_testproc_probe,
};
static const struct udevice_id sandbox_ids[] = {
{.compatible = "sandbox,test-processor"},
{}
};
U_BOOT_DRIVER(sandbox_testproc) = {
.name = "sandbox_test_proc",
.of_match = sandbox_ids,
.id = UCLASS_REMOTEPROC,
.ops = &sandbox_testproc_ops,
.probe = sandbox_testproc_probe,
};
This allows for the device to be probed as part of the "init" command
or invocation of 'rproc_init()' function as the system dependencies define.
@ -110,8 +106,8 @@ provide a load and start function. We assume here that the device
needs to be loaded and started, else, there is no real purpose of
using the remoteproc framework.
3. Describing the device using platform data
============================================
Describing the device using platform data
-----------------------------------------
*IMPORTANT* NOTE: THIS SUPPORT IS NOT MEANT FOR USE WITH NEWER PLATFORM
SUPPORT. THIS IS ONLY FOR LEGACY DEVICES. THIS MODE OF INITIALIZATION
@ -121,16 +117,18 @@ TO DM/FDT.
Considering that many platforms are yet to move to device-tree model,
a simplified definition of a device is as follows:
struct dm_rproc_uclass_pdata proc_3_test = {
.name = "proc_3_legacy",
.mem_type = RPROC_INTERNAL_MEMORY_MAPPED,
.driver_plat_data = &mydriver_data;
};
.. code-block:: c
U_BOOT_DEVICE(proc_3_demo) = {
.name = "sandbox_test_proc",
.platdata = &proc_3_test,
};
struct dm_rproc_uclass_pdata proc_3_test = {
.name = "proc_3_legacy",
.mem_type = RPROC_INTERNAL_MEMORY_MAPPED,
.driver_plat_data = &mydriver_data;
};
U_BOOT_DEVICE(proc_3_demo) = {
.name = "sandbox_test_proc",
.platdata = &proc_3_test,
};
There can be additional data that may be desired depending on the
remoteproc driver specific needs (for example: SoC integration
@ -138,30 +136,33 @@ details such as clock handle or something similar). See appropriate
documentation for specific remoteproc driver for further details.
These are passed via driver_plat_data.
3. Describing the device using device tree
==========================================
/ {
...
aliases {
Describing the device using device tree
---------------------------------------
.. code-block: none
/ {
...
remoteproc0 = &rproc_1;
remoteproc1 = &rproc_2;
aliases {
...
remoteproc0 = &rproc_1;
remoteproc1 = &rproc_2;
};
...
};
...
rproc_1: rproc@1 {
compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev1";
};
rproc_1: rproc@1 {
compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev1";
};
rproc_2: rproc@2 {
compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
internal-memory-mapped;
remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev2";
rproc_2: rproc@2 {
compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
internal-memory-mapped;
remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev2";
};
...
};
...
};
aliases usage is optional, but it is usually recommended to ensure the
users have a consistent usage model for a platform.