[ Upstream commit d44084c93427bb0a9261432db1a8ca76a42d805e ]
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
LPTimer can use a 32KHz clock for counting. It depends on clock tree
configuration. In such a case, PWM output frequency range is limited.
Although unlikely, nothing prevents user from requesting a PWM frequency
above counting clock (32KHz for instance):
- This causes (prd - 1) = 0xffff to be written in ARR register later in
the apply() routine.
This results in badly configured PWM period (and also duty_cycle).
Add a check to report an error is such a case.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the
requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a
driver doing:
#define PERIOD 5000000
#define DUTY_LITTLE 10
...
struct pwm_state state = {
.period = PERIOD,
.duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE,
.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
.enabled = true,
};
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
...
state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2;
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have
state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a
reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call.
So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all
drivers' .apply callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add suspend/resume PM sleep ops. When going to low power, enforce the PWM
channel isn't active. Let the PWM consumers disable it during their own
suspend sequence. Only perform a check here, and handle the pinctrl states.
See [1].
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/5/770
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
LPTimer has only one pwm channel (npwm = 1). Remove useless for loop
in remove routine.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add SPDX identifier to make it easier to determine the license of the
file.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Acked-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The same checking is done by the implementation of pwm_disable().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add support for single PWM channel on Low-Power Timer, that can be
found on some STM32 platforms.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Uwe Kleine-König