commit bc0939fcfab0d7efb2ed12896b1af3d819954a14 upstream.
We have a race between marking that an inode needs to be logged, either
at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() or at btrfs_page_mkwrite(), and between
btrfs_sync_log(). The following steps describe how the race happens.
1) We are at transaction N;
2) Inode I was previously fsynced in the current transaction so it has:
inode->logged_trans set to N;
3) The inode's root currently has:
root->log_transid set to 1
root->last_log_commit set to 0
Which means only one log transaction was committed to far, log
transaction 0. When a log tree is created we set ->log_transid and
->last_log_commit of its parent root to 0 (at btrfs_add_log_tree());
4) One more range of pages is dirtied in inode I;
5) Some task A starts an fsync against some other inode J (same root), and
so it joins log transaction 1.
Before task A calls btrfs_sync_log()...
6) Task B starts an fsync against inode I, which currently has the full
sync flag set, so it starts delalloc and waits for the ordered extent
to complete before calling btrfs_inode_in_log() at btrfs_sync_file();
7) During ordered extent completion we have btrfs_update_inode() called
against inode I, which in turn calls btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(),
which does the following:
spin_lock(&inode->lock);
inode->last_trans = trans->transaction->transid;
inode->last_sub_trans = inode->root->log_transid;
inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit;
spin_unlock(&inode->lock);
So ->last_trans is set to N and ->last_sub_trans set to 1.
But before setting ->last_log_commit...
8) Task A is at btrfs_sync_log():
- it increments root->log_transid to 2
- starts writeback for all log tree extent buffers
- waits for the writeback to complete
- writes the super blocks
- updates root->last_log_commit to 1
It's a lot of slow steps between updating root->log_transid and
root->last_log_commit;
9) The task doing the ordered extent completion, currently at
btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), then finally runs:
inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit;
spin_unlock(&inode->lock);
Which results in inode->last_log_commit being set to 1.
The ordered extent completes;
10) Task B is resumed, and it calls btrfs_inode_in_log() which returns
true because we have all the following conditions met:
inode->logged_trans == N which matches fs_info->generation &&
inode->last_subtrans (1) <= inode->last_log_commit (1) &&
inode->last_subtrans (1) <= root->last_log_commit (1) &&
list inode->extent_tree.modified_extents is empty
And as a consequence we return without logging the inode, so the
existing logged version of the inode does not point to the extent
that was written after the previous fsync.
It should be impossible in practice for one task be able to do so much
progress in btrfs_sync_log() while another task is at
btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() right after it reads root->log_transid and
before it reads root->last_log_commit. Even if kernel preemption is enabled
we know the task at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() can not be preempted
because it is holding the inode's spinlock.
However there is another place where we do the same without holding the
spinlock, which is in the memory mapped write path at:
vm_fault_t btrfs_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
(...)
BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = fs_info->generation;
BTRFS_I(inode)->last_sub_trans = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->log_transid;
BTRFS_I(inode)->last_log_commit = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->last_log_commit;
(...)
So with preemption happening after setting ->last_sub_trans and before
setting ->last_log_commit, it is less of a stretch to have another task
do enough progress at btrfs_sync_log() such that the task doing the memory
mapped write ends up with ->last_sub_trans and ->last_log_commit set to
the same value. It is still a big stretch to get there, as the task doing
btrfs_sync_log() has to start writeback, wait for its completion and write
the super blocks.
So fix this in two different ways:
1) For btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), simply set ->last_log_commit to the
value of ->last_sub_trans minus 1;
2) For btrfs_page_mkwrite() only set the inode's ->last_sub_trans, just
like we do for buffered and direct writes at btrfs_file_write_iter(),
which is all we need to make sure multiple writes and fsyncs to an
inode in the same transaction never result in an fsync missing that
the inode changed and needs to be logged. Turn this into a helper
function and use it both at btrfs_page_mkwrite() and at
btrfs_file_write_iter() - this also fixes the problem that at
btrfs_page_mkwrite() we were setting those fields without the
protection of the inode's spinlock.
This is an extremely unlikely race to happen in practice.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit adca4d945c8dca28a85df45c5b117e6dac2e77f1 upstream
commit a514d63882 ("btrfs: qgroup: Commit transaction in advance to
reduce early EDQUOT") tries to reduce the early EDQUOT problems by
checking the qgroup free against threshold and tries to wake up commit
kthread to free some space.
The problem of that mechanism is, it can only free qgroup per-trans
metadata space, can't do anything to data, nor prealloc qgroup space.
Now since we have the ability to flush qgroup space, and implemented
retry-after-EDQUOT behavior, such mechanism can be completely replaced.
So this patch will cleanup such mechanism in favor of
retry-after-EDQUOT.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 3296bf562443a8ca35aaad959a76a49e9b412760 upstream
The state was introduced in commit 4a9d8bdee3 ("Btrfs: make the state
of the transaction more readable"), then in commit 302167c50b
("btrfs: don't end the transaction for delayed refs in throttle") the
state is completely removed.
So we can just clean up the state since it's only compared but never
set.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit bf31f87f71cc7a89871ab0a451c047a0c0144bf1 ]
The status of aborted transaction can change between calls and it needs
to be accessed by READ_ONCE. Add a helper that also wraps the unlikely
hint.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7f9fe614407692f670601a634621138233ac00d7 ]
For unlink transactions and block group removal
btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv will first try to start an
ordinary transaction and if it fails it will fall back to reserving the
required amount by stealing from the global reserve. This is problematic
because of all the same reasons we had with previous iterations of the
ENOSPC handling, thundering herd. We get a bunch of failures all at
once, everybody tries to allocate from the global reserve, some win and
some lose, we get an ENSOPC.
Fix this behavior by introducing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL. It's
used to mark unlink reservation. To fix this we need to integrate this
logic into the normal ENOSPC infrastructure. We still go through all of
the normal flushing work, and at the moment we begin to fail all the
tickets we try to satisfy any tickets that are allowed to steal by
stealing from the global reserve. If this works we start the flushing
system over again just like we would with a normal ticket satisfaction.
This serializes our global reserve stealing, so we don't have the
thundering herd problem.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The fiemap handler locks a file range that can have unflushed delalloc,
and after locking the range, it tries to attach to a running transaction.
If the running transaction started its commit, that is, it is in state
TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, and either the filesystem was mounted with the
flushoncommit option or the transaction is creating a snapshot for the
subvolume that contains the file that fiemap is operating on, we end up
deadlocking. This happens because fiemap is blocked on the transaction,
waiting for it to complete, and the transaction is waiting for the flushed
dealloc to complete, which requires locking the file range that the fiemap
task already locked. The following stack traces serve as an example of
when this deadlock happens:
(...)
[404571.515510] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
[404571.515956] Call Trace:
[404571.516360] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.516730] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.517104] lock_extent_bits+0x1ec/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[404571.517465] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.517832] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x292/0x800 [btrfs]
[404571.518202] normal_work_helper+0xea/0x530 [btrfs]
[404571.518566] process_one_work+0x21e/0x5c0
[404571.518990] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3b0
[404571.519413] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[404571.519829] kthread+0x103/0x140
[404571.520191] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
[404571.520565] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[404571.520915] kworker/u8:6 D 0 31651 2 0x80004000
[404571.521290] Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_flush_delalloc_helper [btrfs]
(...)
[404571.537000] fsstress D 0 13117 13115 0x00004000
[404571.537263] Call Trace:
[404571.537524] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.537788] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.538066] wait_current_trans+0xc8/0x100 [btrfs]
[404571.538349] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.538680] start_transaction+0x33c/0x500 [btrfs]
[404571.539076] btrfs_check_shared+0xa3/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[404571.539513] ? extent_fiemap+0x2ce/0x650 [btrfs]
[404571.539866] extent_fiemap+0x2ce/0x650 [btrfs]
[404571.540170] do_vfs_ioctl+0x526/0x6f0
[404571.540436] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[404571.540734] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[404571.540997] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1d0
[404571.541279] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
(...)
[404571.543729] btrfs D 0 14210 14208 0x00004000
[404571.544023] Call Trace:
[404571.544275] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.544526] ? wait_for_completion+0x112/0x1a0
[404571.544795] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.545064] schedule_timeout+0x1ff/0x390
[404571.545351] ? lock_acquire+0xa6/0x190
[404571.545638] ? wait_for_completion+0x49/0x1a0
[404571.545890] ? wait_for_completion+0x112/0x1a0
[404571.546228] wait_for_completion+0x131/0x1a0
[404571.546503] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[404571.546775] btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0x27c/0x400 [btrfs]
[404571.547159] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x3b0/0xae0 [btrfs]
[404571.547449] ? btrfs_mksubvol+0x4a4/0x640 [btrfs]
[404571.547703] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.547969] btrfs_mksubvol+0x605/0x640 [btrfs]
[404571.548226] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0x1c0
[404571.548512] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x24/0x50
[404571.548789] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x169/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[404571.549048] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11d/0x170 [btrfs]
[404571.549307] btrfs_ioctl+0x133f/0x3150 [btrfs]
[404571.549549] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x4c/0xd0
[404571.549792] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x84/0x4b0
[404571.550064] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xe3e/0x11f0
[404571.550306] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[404571.550608] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30
[404571.550976] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xedf/0x11f0
[404571.551319] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[404571.551659] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[404571.552087] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[404571.552355] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[404571.552621] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[404571.552864] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1d0
[404571.553104] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
(...)
If we were joining the transaction instead of attaching to it, we would
not risk a deadlock because a join only blocks if the transaction is in a
state greater then or equals to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING, and the delalloc
flush performed by a transaction is done before it reaches that state,
when it is in the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START. However a transaction
join is intended for use cases where we do modify the filesystem, and
fiemap only needs to peek at delayed references from the current
transaction in order to determine if extents are shared, and, besides
that, when there is no current transaction or when it blocks to wait for
a current committing transaction to complete, it creates a new transaction
without reserving any space. Such unnecessary transactions, besides doing
unnecessary IO, can cause transaction aborts (-ENOSPC) and unnecessary
rotation of the precious backup roots.
So fix this by adding a new transaction join variant, named join_nostart,
which behaves like the regular join, but it does not create a transaction
when none currently exists or after waiting for a committing transaction
to complete.
Fixes: 03628cdbc6 ("Btrfs: do not start a transaction during fiemap")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move this into transaction.c with the rest of the transaction related
code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The member num_dirty_bgs of struct btrfs_transaction is not used anymore,
it is set and incremented but nothing reads its value anymore. Its last
read use was removed by commit 64403612b7 ("btrfs: rework
btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs"). So just remove that member.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The pending chunks list contains chunks that are allocated in the
current transaction but haven't been created yet. The pinned chunks
list contains chunks that are being released in the current transaction.
Both describe chunks that are not reflected on disk as in use but are
unavailable just the same.
The pending chunks list is anchored by the transaction handle, which
means that we need to hold a reference to a transaction when working
with the list.
The way we use them is by iterating over both lists to perform
comparisons on the stripes they describe for each device. This is
backwards and requires that we keep a transaction handle open while
we're trimming.
This patchset adds an extent_io_tree to btrfs_device that maintains
the allocation state of the device. Extents are set dirty when
chunks are first allocated -- when the extent maps are added to the
mapping tree. They're cleared when last removed -- when the extent
maps are removed from the mapping tree. This matches the lifespan
of the pending and pinned chunks list and allows us to do trims
on unallocated space safely without pinning the transaction for what
may be a lengthy operation. We can also use this io tree to mark
which chunks have already been trimmed so we don't repeat the operation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We currently overload the pending_chunks list to handle updating
btrfs_device->commit_bytes used. We don't actually care about the
extent mapping or even the device mapping for the chunk - we just need
the device, and we can end up processing it multiple times. The
fs_devices->resized_list does more or less the same thing, but with the
disk size. They are called consecutively during commit and have more or
less the same purpose.
We can combine the two lists into a single list that attaches to the
transaction and contains a list of devices that need updating. Since we
always add the device to a list when we change bytes_used or
disk_total_size, there's no harm in copying both values at once.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit db2462a6ad ("btrfs: don't run delayed refs in the end transaction
logic") removed its last use, so now it does absolutely nothing, therefore
remove it.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The first auto-assigned value to enum is 0, we can use that and not
initialize all members where the auto-increment does the same. This is
used for values that are not part of on-disk format.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Tracking pending ordered extents per transaction was introduced in commit
50d9aa99bd ("Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current
transaction V3") and later updated in commit 161c3549b4 ("Btrfs: change
how we wait for pending ordered extents").
However now that on fsync we always wait for ordered extents to complete
before logging, done in commit 5636cf7d6d ("btrfs: remove the logged
extents infrastructure"), we no longer need the stuff to track for pending
ordered extents, which was not completely removed in the mentioned commit.
So remove the remaining of the pending ordered extents infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The get_seconds() function is deprecated as it truncates the timestamp
to 32 bits. Change it to or ktime_get_real_seconds().
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since there is no more use of qgroup_reserved member in struct
btrfs_pending_snapshot, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Gu JinXiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike previous method that tries to commit transaction inside
qgroup_reserve(), this time we will try to commit transaction using
fs_info->transaction_kthread to avoid nested transaction and no need to
worry about locking context.
Since it's an asynchronous function call and we won't wait for
transaction commit, unlike previous method, we must call it before we
hit the qgroup limit.
So this patch will use the ratio and size of qgroup meta_pertrans
reservation as indicator to check if we should trigger a transaction
commit. (meta_prealloc won't be cleaned in transaction committ, it's
useless anyway)
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Unify the include protection macros to match the file names.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that the userspace transaction ioctls have been removed,
TRANS_USERSPACE is no longer used hence we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The reason why io_bgs can be modified without holding any lock is
non-obvious. Document it and reference that documentation from the
respective call sites.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 0e8c36a9fd ("Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space
is not enough") changed the way transaction reservation is made in
btrfs_evict_node and as a result this function became unused. This has
been the status quo for 5 years in which time no one noticed, so I'd
say it's safe to assume it's unlikely it will ever be used again.
Historical note: there were more attempts to remove the function, the
reasoning was missing and only based on some static analysis tool
reports. Other reason for rejection was that there seemed to be
connection to BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT and that would need to be
removeed to. This was not correct so removing the function is all we can
do.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
[ add the note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are now 20 bytes of holes, we can reduce that to 4 by minor
changes. Moving 'aborted' to the status and flags is also more logical,
similar for num_dirty_bgs. The size goes from 432 to 416.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Recent updates to the structure left some holes, reorder the types so
the packing is tight. The size goes from 112 to 104 on 64bit.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The use_count is a reference counter, we can use the refcount_t type,
though we don't use the atomicity. This is not a performance critical
code and we could catch the underflows. The type is changed from long,
but the number of references will fit an int.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Last user was removed in a monster commit a22285a6a3
("Btrfs: Integrate metadata reservation with start_transaction") in
2010.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The semantics of adding_csums matches bool, 'short' was most likely used
to save space in a698d0755a ("Btrfs: add a type field for the
transaction handle").
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The members have been effectively unused since "Btrfs: rework qgroup
accounting" (fcebe4562d), there's no substitute for
assert_qgroups_uptodate so it's removed as well.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now we only use the root parameter to print the root objectid in
a tracepoint. We can use the root parameter from the transaction
handle for that. It's also used to join the transaction with
async commits, so we remove the comment that it's just for checking.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_write_and_wait_marked_extents and btrfs_sync_log both call
btrfs_wait_marked_extents, which provides a core loop and then handles
errors differently based on whether it's it's a log root or not.
This means that btrfs_write_and_wait_marked_extents needs to take a root
because btrfs_wait_marked_extents requires one, even though it's only
used to determine whether the root is a log root. The log root code
won't ever call into the transaction commit code using a log root, so we
can factor out the core loop and provide the error handling appropriate
to each waiter in new routines. This allows us to eventually remove
the root argument from btrfs_commit_transaction, and as a result,
btrfs_end_transaction.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter
but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to
just accept an fs_info pointer directly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For many printks, we want to know which file system issued the message.
This patch converts most pr_* calls to use the btrfs_* versions instead.
In some cases, this means adding plumbing to allow call sites access to
an fs_info pointer.
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c is left alone for another day.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_trans_handle->root is documented as for use for confirming
that the root passed in to start the transaction is the same as the
one ending it. It's used in several places when an fs_info pointer
is needed, so let's just add an fs_info pointer directly. Eventually,
the root pointer can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test for !trans->blocks_used in btrfs_abort_transaction is
insufficient to determine whether it's safe to drop the transaction
handle on the floor. btrfs_cow_block, informed by should_cow_block,
can return blocks that have already been CoW'd in the current
transaction. trans->blocks_used is only incremented for new block
allocations. If an operation overlaps the blocks in the current
transaction entirely and must abort the transaction, we'll happily
let it clean up the trans handle even though it may have modified
the blocks and will commit an incomplete operation.
In the long-term, I'd like to do closer tracking of when the fs
is actually modified so we can still recover as gracefully as possible,
but that approach will need some discussion. In the short term,
since this is the only code using trans->blocks_used, let's just
switch it to a bool indicating whether any blocks were used and set
it when should_cow_block returns false.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We can also preallocate btrfs_path that's used during pending snapshot
creation and avoid another late ENOMEM failure.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The actual snapshot creation is delayed until transaction commit. If we
cannot get enough memory for the root item there, we have to fail the
whole transaction commit which is bad. So we'll allocate the memory at
the ioctl call and pass it along with the pending_snapshot struct. The
potential ENOMEM will be returned to the caller of snapshot ioctl.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block
groups from being deleted", the following warning at
extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a
filesysten with "-o discard":
10263 void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
10264 {
(...)
10405 if (trimming) {
10406 WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
10407 spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10408 list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
10409 &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
10410 spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10411 btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
10412 }
(...)
This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of
unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we
are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list
of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source
list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock).
The following diagram illustrates how this happens:
CPU 1 CPU 2
cleaner_kthread()
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
sees bg X in list
fs_info->unused_bgs
deletes bg X from list
fs_info->unused_bgs
scrub_enumerate_chunks()
searches device tree using
its commit root
finds device extent for
block group X
gets block group X from the tree
fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
(via btrfs_lookup_block_group())
sets bg X to RO (again)
scrub_chunk(bg X)
sets bg X back to RW mode
adds bg X to the list
fs_info->unused_bgs again,
since it's still unused and
currently not in that list
sets bg X to RO mode
btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
--> discard is enabled and bg X
is in the fs_info->unused_bgs
list again so the warning is
triggered
--> we move it from that list into
the transaction's delete_bgs
list, but we can have another
task currently manipulating
the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs)
Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both
the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This
makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this
lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list
of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously
an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's
not impossible anymore.
Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard").
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we hit ENOSPC when setting up a space cache don't bother setting up any of
the other space cache's in this transaction, it'll just induce unnecessary
latency. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int
lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field
for future use. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that
were logged in the transaction that is currently running. We add the ordered
extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered
extents in that list. However are substantially large file systems this list
can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents
don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete.
To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any
time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current
transaction. Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the
per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones.
This will eliminate the softlockup. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
As we have the new metadata reservation functions, use them to replace
the old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() call for metadata.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef ran into a deadlock while a transaction handle was finalizing the
creation of its block groups, which produced the following trace:
[260445.593112] fio D ffff88022a9df468 0 8924 4518 0x00000084
[260445.593119] ffff88022a9df468 ffffffff81c134c0 ffff880429693c00 ffff88022a9df488
[260445.593126] ffff88022a9e0000 ffff8803490d7b00 ffff8803490d7b18 ffff88022a9df4b0
[260445.593132] ffff8803490d7af8 ffff88022a9df488 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803490d7b00
[260445.593137] Call Trace:
[260445.593145] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80
[260445.593189] [<ffffffffa0850f37>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[260445.593197] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[260445.593225] [<ffffffffa07eac44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs]
[260445.593253] [<ffffffffa07eff6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs]
[260445.593295] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs]
[260445.593324] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[260445.593351] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[260445.593394] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs]
[260445.593427] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs]
[260445.593459] [<ffffffffa0800964>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2a4/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[260445.593491] [<ffffffffa0803815>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs]
[260445.593524] [<ffffffffa0803c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd2/0x220 [btrfs]
[260445.593532] [<ffffffff8119fe5d>] ? account_page_dirtied+0xdd/0x170
[260445.593564] [<ffffffffa0803e78>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[260445.593597] [<ffffffffa080c9de>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
[260445.593626] [<ffffffffa07eb5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[260445.593654] [<ffffffffa07ebbff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[260445.593682] [<ffffffffa07ef8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs]
[260445.593724] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs]
[260445.593752] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[260445.593830] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[260445.593905] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs]
[260445.593946] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs]
[260445.593990] [<ffffffffa0815798>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa8/0xb40 [btrfs]
[260445.594042] [<ffffffffa085abcd>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs]
[260445.594089] [<ffffffffa082bc84>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs]
[260445.594115] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
[260445.594133] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180
[260445.594149] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
[260445.594169] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110
[260445.594187] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
[260445.594204] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71
This happened because the same transaction handle created a large number
of block groups and while finalizing their creation (inserting new items
and updating existing items in the chunk and device trees) a new metadata
extent had to be allocated and no free space was found in the current
metadata block groups, which made find_free_extent() attempt to allocate
a new block group via do_chunk_alloc(). However at do_chunk_alloc() we
ended up allocating a new system chunk too and exceeded the threshold
of 2Mb of reserved chunk bytes, which makes do_chunk_alloc() enter the
final part of block group creation again (at
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()) and attempt to lock again the root
of the chunk tree when it's already write locked by the same task.
Similarly we can deadlock on extent tree nodes/leafs if while we are
running delayed references we end up creating a new metadata block group
in order to allocate a new node/leaf for the extent tree (as part of
a CoW operation or growing the tree), as btrfs_create_pending_block_groups
inserts items into the extent tree as well. In this case we get the
following trace:
[14242.773581] fio D ffff880428ca3418 0 3615 3100 0x00000084
[14242.773588] ffff880428ca3418 ffff88042d66b000 ffff88042a03c800 ffff880428ca3438
[14242.773594] ffff880428ca4000 ffff8803e4b20190 ffff8803e4b201a8 ffff880428ca3460
[14242.773600] ffff8803e4b20188 ffff880428ca3438 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803e4b20190
[14242.773606] Call Trace:
[14242.773613] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80
[14242.773656] [<ffffffffa057ff07>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[14242.773664] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[14242.773692] [<ffffffffa0519c44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs]
[14242.773720] [<ffffffffa051ef6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs]
[14242.773750] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[14242.773758] [<ffffffff811ef4a2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d2/0x200
[14242.773786] [<ffffffffa0520ad1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x71/0xf0 [btrfs]
[14242.773818] [<ffffffffa052f292>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x102/0x200 [btrfs]
[14242.773850] [<ffffffffa052f96e>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2ae/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[14242.773934] [<ffffffffa0532825>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs]
[14242.773998] [<ffffffffa0532c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xc2/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[14242.774041] [<ffffffffa0532e38>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[14242.774078] [<ffffffffa051a5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[14242.774118] [<ffffffffa051abff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[14242.774155] [<ffffffffa051e8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs]
[14242.774194] [<ffffffffa0528021>] ? __btrfs_free_extent.isra.70+0x2e1/0xcb0 [btrfs]
[14242.774235] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[14242.774274] [<ffffffffa051994a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[14242.774318] [<ffffffffa052c433>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xbb3/0x1020 [btrfs]
[14242.774358] [<ffffffffa052f404>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs.part.78+0x74/0x280 [btrfs]
[14242.774391] [<ffffffffa052f627>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
[14242.774432] [<ffffffffa05be236>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x8d/0x2bd [btrfs]
[14242.774474] [<ffffffffa059d07f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1cf/0x210 [btrfs]
[14242.774516] [<ffffffffa05adac3>] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x83/0x130 [btrfs]
[14242.774558] [<ffffffffa0544c40>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x590/0xb40 [btrfs]
[14242.774599] [<ffffffffa0589b9d>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs]
[14242.774642] [<ffffffffa055ac54>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs]
[14242.774650] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
[14242.774657] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180
[14242.774663] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
[14242.774669] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110
[14242.774675] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
[14242.774681] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71
Fix this by never recursing into the finalization phase of block group
creation and making sure we never trigger the finalization of block group
creation while running delayed references.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Fixes: 00d80e342c ("Btrfs: fix quick exhaustion of the system array in the superblock")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
When dropping a snapshot we need to account for the qgroup changes. If we drop
the snapshot in all one go then the backref code will fail to find blocks from
the snapshot we dropped since it won't be able to find the root in the fs root
cache. This can lead to us failing to find refs from other roots that pointed
at blocks in the now deleted root. To handle this we need to not remove the fs
roots from the cache until after we process the qgroup operations. Do this by
adding dropped roots to a list on the transaction, and letting the transaction
remove the roots at the same time it drops the commit roots. This will keep all
of the backref searching code in sync properly, and fixes a problem Mark was
seeing with snapshot delete and qgroups. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents
in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being
unable to discard the freed extents.
The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents
other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit. As a result, any extents that
would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded. In my
test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it
left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded.
To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list
that will be discarded after transaction commit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This is used by later qgroup fix patches for snapshot.
As current snapshot accounting is done by btrfs_qgroup_inherit(), but
new extent oriented quota mechanism will account extent from
btrfs_copy_root() and other snapshot things, causing wrong result.
So add this ability to handle snapshot accounting.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:
[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116] [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593] [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960] [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649] [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092] [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218] [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622] [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642] [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692] [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---
This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.
So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.
Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.
The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
