From 04a333cf982ce9c14026edc43239f1fd340bbdfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:08:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ceph: remove bogus checks and WARN_ONs from ceph_set_page_dirty [ Upstream commit 22d41cdcd3cfd467a4af074165357fcbea1c37f5 ] The checks for page->mapping are odd, as set_page_dirty is an address_space operation, and I don't see where it would be called on a non-pagecache page. The warning about the page lock also seems bogus. The comment over set_page_dirty() says that it can be called without the page lock in some rare cases. I don't think we want to warn if that's the case. Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ceph/addr.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c index a02e845eb0fb..34ab7b892b70 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c @@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) struct inode *inode; struct ceph_inode_info *ci; struct ceph_snap_context *snapc; - int ret; - - if (unlikely(!mapping)) - return !TestSetPageDirty(page); if (PageDirty(page)) { dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n", @@ -125,11 +121,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) page->private = (unsigned long)snapc; SetPagePrivate(page); - ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); - WARN_ON(!PageLocked(page)); - WARN_ON(!page->mapping); - - return ret; + return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); } /*